Data is expressed as number within the sample who possess the characteristic.
In a nutshell, your Discussion fulfills the promise you made to readers in your Introduction. At the beginning of your paper, you tell us why we should care about your research.
You then guide us through a series of intricate images and graphs that capture all the relevant data you collected during your research. We may be dazzled and impressed at first, but none of that matters if you deliver an anti-climactic conclusion in the Discussion section!
Are you feeling pressured? To be honest, you will edit the Discussion part of your manuscript numerous times. You must also recommend how we might get to point C i. So, how do you do that?
What should I include in the Discussion section? As we stated above, the goal of your Discussion section is to answer the questions you raise in your Introduction by using the results you collected during your research.
The content you include in the Discussions segment should reflect the following information: Remind us why we should be interested in this research project. Describe the nature of the knowledge gap you were trying to fill using the results of your study. Instead, focus on why this particular study was needed to fill the gap you noticed and why that gap needed filling in the first place.
Mainly, you want to remind us of how your research will increase our knowledge base and inspire others to conduct further research.
Clearly tell us what that piece of missing knowledge was. Answer each of the questions you asked in your Introduction and explain how your results support those conclusions.
Make sure to factor in all results relevant to the questions even if those results were not statistically significant. Focus on the significance of the most noteworthy results.
If conflicting inferences can be drawn from your results, evaluate the merits of all of them. Rather, discuss your findings in the context of answering your hypothesis.
Discuss whether your findings agree with current knowledge and expectations.
Keep in mind good persuasive argument skills, such as explaining the strengths of your arguments and highlighting the weaknesses of contrary opinions. If you discovered something unexpected, offer reasons. Address any limitations of your study and how relevant they are to interpreting your results and validating your findings.
Make sure to acknowledge any weaknesses in your conclusions and suggest room for further research concerning that aspect of your analysis. Doing so might raise questions about your initial research design and protocols.
Similarly, maintain a critical but unapologetic tone. Your suggestions should inspire other researchers to conduct follow-up studies to build upon the knowledge you have shared with them.
Keep the list short no more than two. How should I write the Discussion section? Technical writing elements Embrace active voice because it eliminates the awkward phrasing and wordiness that accompanies passive voice. Use the present voice, which should also be employed in the Introduction.
Sprinkle with first person pronouns if needed, but generally, avoid it. We want to focus on your findings. Maintain an objective and analytical tone. Organization Keep the same flow across the Results, Methods, and Discussion sections. We develop a rhythm as we read and parallel structures facilitate our comprehension.
When you organize information the same way in each of these related parts of your journal manuscript, we can quickly see how a certain result was interpreted and quickly verify the particular methods used to produce that result.
Notice how using parallel structure will eliminate extra narration in the Discussion part since we can anticipate the flow of your ideas based on what we read in the Results segment. Reducing wordiness is important when you only have a few paragraphs to devote to the Discussion section!Home Writing a Research Paper Series: Discussion.
Specialized, Comprehensive and Affordable Research Support Services. 5 Common Mistakes to Avoid when Writing a Discussion.
Great tips for write research papers but my teachers show very strictness in research paper writing. So I also find sociology research paper example I have various sources.
In this critical part of the research paper, you start the process of explaining any links and correlations apparent in your data.. If you left few interesting leads and open questions in the results section, the discussion is simply a matter of building upon those and expanding them.
Jul 25, · To write a discussion essay, start by taking a side on the issue you're writing about, like "Immigration is good for the country." Then, outline the main points that made you decide to take that position and do research to find evidence that backs them up%(26).
Feb 12, · Writing manuscripts to describe study outcomes, although not easy, is the main task of an academician. The aim of the present review is to outline the main aspects of writing the discussion section of a manuscript.
Writing a research manuscript is an intimidating process for many novice writers in the sciences. One of the stumbling blocks is the beginning of the process and creating the first draft.
This paper presents guidelines on how to initiate the writing process and draft each section of a research. How to write the results and discussion. Michael P.
Dosch CRNA MS June Results. Be happy!
You’re getting there. Just a small .