A literary analysis of the study of sociology

Ibn Khaldun statue in TunisTunisia — Sociological reasoning predates the foundation of the discipline. Social analysis has origins in the common stock of Western knowledge and philosophyand has been carried out from as far back as the time of ancient Greek philosopher Platoif not before. There is evidence of early sociology in medieval Arab writings.

A literary analysis of the study of sociology

History[ edit ] The practice of literary theory became a profession in the 20th century, but it has historical roots that run as far back as ancient Greece Aristotle 's Poetics is an often cited early exampleancient India Bharata Muni 's Natya Shastraancient Rome Longinus 's On the Sublime and medieval Iraq Al-Jahiz 's al-Bayan wa-'l-tabyin and al-Hayawan, and ibn al-Mu'tazz 's Kitab al-Badi.

The A literary analysis of the study of sociology and criticism of literature are, of course, also closely tied to the history of literature.

A literary analysis of the study of sociology

However, the modern sense of "literary theory" only dates to approximately the s when the structuralist linguistics of Ferdinand de Saussure began to strongly influence English language literary criticism.

The New Critics and various European-influenced formalists particularly the Russian Formalists had described some of their more abstract efforts as "theoretical" as well. But it was not until the broad impact of structuralism began to be felt in the English-speaking academic world that "literary theory" was thought of as a unified domain.

In the academic world of the United Kingdom and the United States, literary theory was at its most popular from the late s when its influence was beginning to spread outward from elite universities like Johns HopkinsYaleand Cornell through the s by which time it was taught nearly everywhere in some form.

During this span of time, literary theory was perceived as academically cutting-edge, and most university literature departments sought to teach and study theory and incorporate it into their curricula.

Because of its meteoric rise in popularity and the difficult language of its key texts, theory was also often criticized as faddish or trendy obscurantism and many academic satire novels of the period, such as those by David Lodgefeature theory prominently.

Some scholars, both theoretical and anti-theoretical, refer to the s and s debates on the academic merits of theory as "the theory wars". By the early s, the popularity of "theory" as a subject of interest by itself was declining slightly along with job openings for pure "theorists" even as the texts of literary theory were incorporated into the study of almost all literature.

Bythe controversy over the use of theory in literary studies had quieted down, and discussions on the topic within literary and cultural studies tend now to be considerably milder and less lively.

However, some scholars like Mark Bauerlein continue to argue that less capable theorists have abandoned proven methods of epistemologyresulting in persistent lapses in learning, research, and evaluation.

Specific theories are distinguished not only by their methods and conclusions, but even by how they create meaning in a " text ". However, some theorists acknowledge that these texts do not have a singular, fixed meaning which is deemed "correct".

There are many types of literary theory, which take different approaches to texts. Even among those listed below, many scholars combine methods from more than one of these approaches for instance, the deconstructive approach of Paul de Man drew on a long tradition of close reading pioneered by the New Criticsand de Man was trained in the European hermeneutic tradition.

Differences among schools[ edit ] This section possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.

May Learn how and when to remove this template message The different interpretive and epistemological perspectives of different schools of theory often arise from, and so give support to, different moral and political commitments.

For instance, the work of the New Critics often contained an implicit moral dimension, and sometimes even a religious one: Eliot or Gerard Manley Hopkins for its degree of honesty in expressing the torment and contradiction of a serious search for belief in the modern world.

Meanwhile, a Marxist critic might find such judgments merely ideological rather than critical; the Marxist would say that the New Critical reading did not keep enough critical distance from the poem's religious stance to be able to understand it. Or a post-structuralist critic might simply avoid the issue by understanding the religious meaning of a poem as an allegory of meaning, treating the poem's references to "God" by discussing their referential nature rather than what they refer to.

A critic using Darwinian literary studies might use arguments from the evolutionary psychology of religion. Such a disagreement cannot be easily resolved, because it is inherent in the radically different terms and goals that is, the theories of the critics.

Their theories of reading derive from vastly different intellectual traditions: In the late s, the Canadian literary critic Northrop Frye attempted to establish an approach for reconciling historical criticism and New Criticism while addressing concerns of early reader-response and numerous psychological and social approaches.

His approach, laid out in his Anatomy of Criticismwas explicitly structuralist, relying on the assumption of an intertextual "order of words" and universality of certain structural types. His approach held sway in English literature programs for several decades but lost favor during the ascendance of post-structuralism.

For some theories of literature especially certain kinds of formalismthe distinction between "literary" and other sorts of texts is of paramount importance. Other schools particularly post-structuralism in its various forms:The Sociological Approach to Literary Criticism A person who examines a text closely, looking for deeper meaning and insights, is called a literary critic.

As a member, you'll also get unlimited access to over 75, lessons in math, English, science, history, and more.

Social Science History Bibliography

Plus, get practice tests, quizzes, and personalized coaching to help you succeed. Teaching Various Text Types & Literary Analysis. Teaching Various Text Types & Literary Analysis Related Study Materials. MTTC Sociology (): Practice & .

LITERARY ANALYSIS OF GENESIS — Introduction (Personal Testimony) physic, anthropology, physiology, psychology and sociology classes, the same attitude prevailed. How can a student combat such a formidable and galvanized affront toward the Scriptures? Especially if it comes from an university professor who The following .

Be Book-Smarter.

Joseph Hayim Abraham Uncle of Isaac Hai (Jack) Jacob, Worked for the Egyptian Educational Service from to From to he was Extension Lecturer in Sociology at the University of London.

Sociology is the scientific study of society, patterns of social relationships, social interaction, and culture of everyday life. It is a social science that uses various methods of empirical investigation and critical analysis to develop a body of knowledge about social order, acceptance, and change or social arteensevilla.com sociologists aim to conduct research that may be applied directly to.

Sociology of literature - Wikipedia