At the beginning, they have a nearly unanimous decision of guilty, with a single dissenter of not-guilty, who throughout the play sows a seed of reasonable doubt. The story begins after closing arguments have been presented in the homicide case, as the judge is giving his instructions to the jury.
The film captivates the audience from the beginning. Each of the twelve jurors are introduced to us as they are introduced to themselves.
The characters are well draw out and individual, each with his own personality. The tension of the characters draws the audience in from the start. We imagine that the case is open and shut, 11 me saying guilty and 1 not.
We feel the discomfort of Henry Fonda as the other characters belittle and mock how he can see any reasonable doubt in the case. But we also share his victories and the enthusiasm as he proceeds to refute or add doubt to the arguments for guilty and are captivated and draw in as other jurors begin to see doubt in the proceedings.
Yet they also feel the shame of the 12 angry men drama as he disproves that a previously sound theory is iron tight, joining his side as members of the jury do. On top of this they are wonderfully woven in human elements such as the misconceptions that influence people and the growing tension between different characters.
This is brought to life even more by the amazing performances, Fonda, Lee J Cobb and Joseph Sweeney are of particular note. I started watching this film on a bored relaxed laying about day but by the end i was on the edge of the seat with my hands on my knees feeling more tense than a politician on results day.
How a film should be made. Films rarely get this uplifting and brilliant. I cannot think of the last time I was so intrigued by the flawless plot, dialogue and acting since 12 Angry Men. For such a simplistic story set in one jury room, it is surprising that Sidney Lumet can drain you of all your emotions and leave you on the edge of your seat with suspense, mystery, and some of the best acting your bound to ever see grace the silver screen!
When a boy is on last day of trial for killing his father in the heat of domestic arguments, 12 jury men are forced to present a verdict in which if guilty, is the one way ticket to the electric chair for the boy.
Trial and Character revelations, doubts, and possibilities follow. So masterfully crafted is this film, that every time I watch it, only gets better.
Sidney Lumet is an expert in this field and this is by far his greatest contribution to Hollywood history - one of the most important contributions to world cinema. However it was Henry Fonda and Lee J. Cobb who really made this film legendary, with their incredibly realistic performances.
And the dialogue was astoundingly riveting up until the brilliant finale. What really impressed me personally also was the camera angles and movements that made the film so suspenseful. Black and White made the film all the more powerful.
And the music was minimal, which gave the film a more atmospheric experience, like you were their in the jury room with them - and you just feel that tension really built up as the movie proceeds.
This inexpensive film, with such a simple setting had the world talking, the academy awards nominations rolling and Henry Fonda at his complete best form. This is a definitive viewing for anyone who loves film.'12 Angry Men' is an outstanding film.
It is proof that, for a film to be great, it does not need extensive scenery, elaborate costumes or expensive special effects - .
May 26, · This is the original version of Twelve Angry Men, broadcast live on September 20, , as part of the CBS-TV anthology series Studio One. The first production of this now iconic drama. Filmmaker Austin Stark Was Determined To Cast Peter Fonda In His New Bp Oil Spill Drama The Runner Because The Veteran Actor Was Already Somewhat Of An Expert On The Environmental Disaster.
12 Angry Men is a American courtroom drama film adapted from a teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose. Written and co-produced by Rose himself and directed by Sidney Lumet, this trial film tells the story of a jury made up of 12 men as they deliberate the conviction or acquittal of a defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt, forcing the .
That seems different, though, because it requires rejecting one ideology/ingroup, namely Catholicism. It makes sense that people identifying as Catholic would resent that the Protestants found a way to weaken Catholicism, and apparently people who “took the soup” were ostracized.
Twelve Angry Men succeeds on a number of levels. First, it serves as an excellent lesson in civics. In particular, it illustrates the application of the Seventh Amendment, a component of the Bill of Rights (see below).